Pranyx.ai

Pranyx / Compliance Studio

Compliance Studio

Deterministic enforcement
for AI-driven workflows.

AI can propose an action. Pranyx independently checks whether the formal workflow permits it. See this principle in action in our Patient Intake demonstration.

Protected demo. Existing Pranyx access code required.

The problem

Putting an SOP in a prompt is not enforcement.

Instructions guide a probabilistic model. They do not guarantee that every proposed action follows a required procedure.

The AI does not judge
its own compliance.

Pranyx's approach places an independent decision boundary between a proposed action and permission to proceed. Our current simulation demonstrates that boundary for a defined Patient Intake policy.

The enforcement concept

From a written procedure
to an explainable decision.

  1. 01

    SOP / Policy

    The procedure defines the intended workflow.

  2. 02

    Formalization

    The procedure is represented as a formal model.

  3. 03

    Proposed action

    An AI or application proposes the next step.

  4. 04

    Pranyx evaluation

    Defined transitions and conditions are checked independently.

  5. 05

    ALLOW / BLOCK

    The decision follows the supported policy rules.

  6. 06

    Formal evidence

    The relevant condition and context explain the decision.

Demonstrated today with Patient Intake and a policy based on its generated formal model. Automatic runtime enforcement for arbitrary SOPs and interception of live AI actions are future capabilities.

Patient Intake / demonstration example

Same starting point.
A different decision.

Patient information has been received. What should the workflow be allowed to do next?

Follow the defined sequence

Patient Information ReceivedInsurance Validation

ALLOWED

Insurance validation is the next permitted step in the demonstrated policy.

Attempt to skip validation

Patient Information ReceivedClinical Risk Assessment

BLOCKED

This action would bypass mandatory validation stages. Insurance validation must happen next.

Why this matters

A decision you can question.
Evidence you can inspect.

01 / Independent

A separate decision boundary

The proposed action is checked by Pranyx, not approved by the AI that suggested it.

02 / Deterministic

Rules, not another opinion

For the same supported Patient Intake state and context, the evaluator returns the same decision. No LLM decides ALLOW or BLOCK.

03 / Explainable

A reason and a compliant route

See which condition was required, which facts were used and which supported actions are permitted instead.

04 / Inspectable

Formal evidence behind the outcome

Move from the business explanation to the exact transition and condition used in the evaluation.

For your technical team

The evidence is there
when you need it.

The protected Technical Evidence view exposes the formal model, state machine, rule definitions, evaluation response and generation trace.

Start with the guided Live Demo, then inspect the same system through a technical lens.

A Patient Intake proof of concept, not regulatory certification or a production enforcement gateway.